<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Trojan Horse with a Touchscreen</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ratdiary.com/2008/06/09/the-trojan-horse-with-a-touchscreen/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ratdiary.com/2008/06/09/the-trojan-horse-with-a-touchscreen/</link>
	<description>Homo homini rodentius est</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 19:20:21 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: WinExtra - Sunday Blog Review: Diary of a Rat</title>
		<link>http://www.ratdiary.com/2008/06/09/the-trojan-horse-with-a-touchscreen/#comment-8366</link>
		<dc:creator>WinExtra - Sunday Blog Review: Diary of a Rat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 06:47:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ratdiary.com/2008/06/09/the-trojan-horse-with-a-touchscreen/#comment-8366</guid>
		<description>[...] Will Always Be an A-list The Trojan Horse with a Touchscreen A Beginner Guide to RSS (Feeds) Bubble [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Will Always Be an A-list The Trojan Horse with a Touchscreen A Beginner Guide to RSS (Feeds) Bubble [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nigel</title>
		<link>http://www.ratdiary.com/2008/06/09/the-trojan-horse-with-a-touchscreen/#comment-6577</link>
		<dc:creator>nigel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jul 2008 17:00:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ratdiary.com/2008/06/09/the-trojan-horse-with-a-touchscreen/#comment-6577</guid>
		<description>Google is not a loser.  They still follow their long term strategy.  They have first started with their mobile apps: Google talk, maps, etc.  These apps already exist.  What comes next? A mobile OS build a framework around the already developed components.  Keep expanding.  Apple set the stage, now Google takes over with a platform independent solution.  You don&#039;t need an iPhone anymore when everything has a great platform independent interface.  You don&#039;t have to be the first pioneer in order to win in a certain market.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google is not a loser.  They still follow their long term strategy.  They have first started with their mobile apps: Google talk, maps, etc.  These apps already exist.  What comes next? A mobile OS build a framework around the already developed components.  Keep expanding.  Apple set the stage, now Google takes over with a platform independent solution.  You don&#8217;t need an iPhone anymore when everything has a great platform independent interface.  You don&#8217;t have to be the first pioneer in order to win in a certain market.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sprague D</title>
		<link>http://www.ratdiary.com/2008/06/09/the-trojan-horse-with-a-touchscreen/#comment-5897</link>
		<dc:creator>Sprague D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 19:00:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ratdiary.com/2008/06/09/the-trojan-horse-with-a-touchscreen/#comment-5897</guid>
		<description>David,

Browsers run on operating systems and 95% of computer users use Windows. Google is subject to Microsoft leveraging their ownership of the platform to impact search behavior -- that&#039;s why Google was so concerned about Vista integrating search features that bypassed the browser.

And I have to disagree about Google&#039;s agility -- when it comes to revenue, Google is anything but agile -- almost all of their income comes from search-related advertising. If that market were to be impacted by the recession, or aggressive moves by Microsoft, they would be hurting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David,</p>
<p>Browsers run on operating systems and 95% of computer users use Windows. Google is subject to Microsoft leveraging their ownership of the platform to impact search behavior &#8212; that&#8217;s why Google was so concerned about Vista integrating search features that bypassed the browser.</p>
<p>And I have to disagree about Google&#8217;s agility &#8212; when it comes to revenue, Google is anything but agile &#8212; almost all of their income comes from search-related advertising. If that market were to be impacted by the recession, or aggressive moves by Microsoft, they would be hurting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Keech</title>
		<link>http://www.ratdiary.com/2008/06/09/the-trojan-horse-with-a-touchscreen/#comment-5892</link>
		<dc:creator>David Keech</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 14:52:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ratdiary.com/2008/06/09/the-trojan-horse-with-a-touchscreen/#comment-5892</guid>
		<description>What makes you think that Google is dependant on Microsoft ?  The majority of Google&#039;s income comes from normal advertising on normal websites.  This is dependant only on users with browsers.  Nothing more.

Furthermore, Google is an agile company.  If something changed overnight so that no websites would use Adsense anymore, Google would be able to create a new revenue stream to compensate for it.  While they were doing that, Google would still have all the ad revenue from its own web properties (blogger, gmail, igoogle, search results, etc.) and its other, non-advertising revenue such as sales of its search appliance.

I don&#039;t think the iPhone or MobileMe is any danger whatsoever to Google.

As much as I love the new features of the iPhone - they&#039;re enough to make me want to buy one now - the MobileMe platform causes me to hesitate.  I still remember what Apple did to .Mac and I suspect a lot of other Apple fans will remember that as well.  Apple have gained a lot of new fans since then so MobileMe may be a success straight away but if too many people remember the .Mac bait-and-switch then Apple may find the uptake a bit slower than expected.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What makes you think that Google is dependant on Microsoft ?  The majority of Google&#8217;s income comes from normal advertising on normal websites.  This is dependant only on users with browsers.  Nothing more.</p>
<p>Furthermore, Google is an agile company.  If something changed overnight so that no websites would use Adsense anymore, Google would be able to create a new revenue stream to compensate for it.  While they were doing that, Google would still have all the ad revenue from its own web properties (blogger, gmail, igoogle, search results, etc.) and its other, non-advertising revenue such as sales of its search appliance.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think the iPhone or MobileMe is any danger whatsoever to Google.</p>
<p>As much as I love the new features of the iPhone &#8211; they&#8217;re enough to make me want to buy one now &#8211; the MobileMe platform causes me to hesitate.  I still remember what Apple did to .Mac and I suspect a lot of other Apple fans will remember that as well.  Apple have gained a lot of new fans since then so MobileMe may be a success straight away but if too many people remember the .Mac bait-and-switch then Apple may find the uptake a bit slower than expected.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sprague D</title>
		<link>http://www.ratdiary.com/2008/06/09/the-trojan-horse-with-a-touchscreen/#comment-5865</link>
		<dc:creator>Sprague D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 03:57:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ratdiary.com/2008/06/09/the-trojan-horse-with-a-touchscreen/#comment-5865</guid>
		<description>Jason,

I&#039;m more and more impressed with the focus at Apple -- a much smaller company than Microsoft that consistently delivers on a clear vision. If they make a significant move into enterprises, it&#039;ll be a business school case study for the ages...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jason,</p>
<p>I&#8217;m more and more impressed with the focus at Apple &#8212; a much smaller company than Microsoft that consistently delivers on a clear vision. If they make a significant move into enterprises, it&#8217;ll be a business school case study for the ages&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Webomatica</title>
		<link>http://www.ratdiary.com/2008/06/09/the-trojan-horse-with-a-touchscreen/#comment-5864</link>
		<dc:creator>Webomatica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 03:08:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ratdiary.com/2008/06/09/the-trojan-horse-with-a-touchscreen/#comment-5864</guid>
		<description>Yeah this could be very big for Apple. I think they have a good shot because the mobile device is very desirable and the software demonstrates clear utility. It&#039;s what you can do with it that will be seductive to the consumer. And yeah - Apple is definitely trying to make stuff that people will pay for, imagine that...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah this could be very big for Apple. I think they have a good shot because the mobile device is very desirable and the software demonstrates clear utility. It&#8217;s what you can do with it that will be seductive to the consumer. And yeah &#8211; Apple is definitely trying to make stuff that people will pay for, imagine that&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
