<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: South Carolina Dems elect McCain</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ratdiary.com/2008/01/27/south-carolina-dems-elect-mccain/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ratdiary.com/2008/01/27/south-carolina-dems-elect-mccain/</link>
	<description>Homo homini rodentius est</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 19:20:21 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: jm</title>
		<link>http://www.ratdiary.com/2008/01/27/south-carolina-dems-elect-mccain/#comment-4756</link>
		<dc:creator>jm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 00:30:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ratdiary.com/2008/01/27/south-carolina-dems-elect-mccain/#comment-4756</guid>
		<description>Democrats didnt win the majority white male vote with B.Clinton or Gore....but won all three elections er... popular votes. Obama can do this thing, esp. since the white &quot;majority&quot; no longer exists.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Democrats didnt win the majority white male vote with B.Clinton or Gore&#8230;.but won all three elections er&#8230; popular votes. Obama can do this thing, esp. since the white &#8220;majority&#8221; no longer exists.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sprague D</title>
		<link>http://www.ratdiary.com/2008/01/27/south-carolina-dems-elect-mccain/#comment-4755</link>
		<dc:creator>Sprague D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 13:34:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ratdiary.com/2008/01/27/south-carolina-dems-elect-mccain/#comment-4755</guid>
		<description>Aatom,

One of the previous posts I linked to comments on a Marist poll from last year that showed only 50% of the electorate would consider voting for a woman for president. I think it would hard going for *any* woman to be elected, but especially this woman who brings so much baggage.

I appreciate the enthusiasm you feel for Obama, it&#039;s clear that he touches a deep chord in people and that&#039;s not insignificant. But I think it&#039;s too soon for him. I doubt he would have the practical ability to put his ideals into practice and I don&#039;t think he will win against McCain, though it would be good for the country if he ran.

I know what enthusiasm for an idealistic challenger feels like -- the first election I ever participated in was 1980, when I volunteered for Kennedy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aatom,</p>
<p>One of the previous posts I linked to comments on a Marist poll from last year that showed only 50% of the electorate would consider voting for a woman for president. I think it would hard going for *any* woman to be elected, but especially this woman who brings so much baggage.</p>
<p>I appreciate the enthusiasm you feel for Obama, it&#8217;s clear that he touches a deep chord in people and that&#8217;s not insignificant. But I think it&#8217;s too soon for him. I doubt he would have the practical ability to put his ideals into practice and I don&#8217;t think he will win against McCain, though it would be good for the country if he ran.</p>
<p>I know what enthusiasm for an idealistic challenger feels like &#8212; the first election I ever participated in was 1980, when I volunteered for Kennedy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aatom</title>
		<link>http://www.ratdiary.com/2008/01/27/south-carolina-dems-elect-mccain/#comment-4754</link>
		<dc:creator>Aatom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 07:34:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ratdiary.com/2008/01/27/south-carolina-dems-elect-mccain/#comment-4754</guid>
		<description>&quot;And I never said Hillary is electable in a general election — I don’t believe she will ever be president. My point is that the challenge from Obama makes her election even less likely were she to be the Democratic candidate.&quot;

Am I to understand that you think the fix is in, and the Dems will lose possibly the easiest election that has ever been granted them in modern history? I wholeheartedly hope you are wrong! As a confirmed (and controversial in insignificant quarters!) Independent, I sincerely hope you are wrong. I think Carter is just as irrelevant now as he has always been, any attempt to associate him with Obama would require significant argument on your part.

And I can&#039;t help but feel that this post has garnered a notable amount of comment here, which I feel works in Obama&#039;s favor. There is an engagement factor at work this time around that our country hasn&#039;t felt for quite a while.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;And I never said Hillary is electable in a general election — I don’t believe she will ever be president. My point is that the challenge from Obama makes her election even less likely were she to be the Democratic candidate.&#8221;</p>
<p>Am I to understand that you think the fix is in, and the Dems will lose possibly the easiest election that has ever been granted them in modern history? I wholeheartedly hope you are wrong! As a confirmed (and controversial in insignificant quarters!) Independent, I sincerely hope you are wrong. I think Carter is just as irrelevant now as he has always been, any attempt to associate him with Obama would require significant argument on your part.</p>
<p>And I can&#8217;t help but feel that this post has garnered a notable amount of comment here, which I feel works in Obama&#8217;s favor. There is an engagement factor at work this time around that our country hasn&#8217;t felt for quite a while.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Idlmind</title>
		<link>http://www.ratdiary.com/2008/01/27/south-carolina-dems-elect-mccain/#comment-4753</link>
		<dc:creator>Idlmind</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 04:13:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ratdiary.com/2008/01/27/south-carolina-dems-elect-mccain/#comment-4753</guid>
		<description>Vote for McCain :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vote for McCain <img src='http://www.ratdiary.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David in AK</title>
		<link>http://www.ratdiary.com/2008/01/27/south-carolina-dems-elect-mccain/#comment-4751</link>
		<dc:creator>David in AK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 01:38:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ratdiary.com/2008/01/27/south-carolina-dems-elect-mccain/#comment-4751</guid>
		<description>The bottom line is that you appear to be upset simply because Obama&#039;s challenge has been more successful than you wanted or anticipated.  And if we can&#039;t have successful challenges during the primaries, why bother with a democratic process?  Just for show?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The bottom line is that you appear to be upset simply because Obama&#8217;s challenge has been more successful than you wanted or anticipated.  And if we can&#8217;t have successful challenges during the primaries, why bother with a democratic process?  Just for show?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David in AK</title>
		<link>http://www.ratdiary.com/2008/01/27/south-carolina-dems-elect-mccain/#comment-4750</link>
		<dc:creator>David in AK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 01:31:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ratdiary.com/2008/01/27/south-carolina-dems-elect-mccain/#comment-4750</guid>
		<description>At no time was Ralph Nader ahead of any of the major party candidates in polls or in the delegate count.  Obama is well ahead of Clinton in the delegate count--perhaps you should stop assuming that her coronation is a foregone conclusion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At no time was Ralph Nader ahead of any of the major party candidates in polls or in the delegate count.  Obama is well ahead of Clinton in the delegate count&#8211;perhaps you should stop assuming that her coronation is a foregone conclusion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sprague D</title>
		<link>http://www.ratdiary.com/2008/01/27/south-carolina-dems-elect-mccain/#comment-4749</link>
		<dc:creator>Sprague D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 01:25:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ratdiary.com/2008/01/27/south-carolina-dems-elect-mccain/#comment-4749</guid>
		<description>David,

Suggesting that by considering the effect Obama&#039;s challenge has on the putative front-runner in his party is somehow keeping down &quot;uppity blacks&quot; is itself repugnant... and patronizing.

Would you have said criticizing Kennedy&#039;s challenge of Carter was an example of keeping down &quot;uppity rich white Irish&quot;? Was criticism of Ralph Nader&#039;s challenge to Gore keeping down &quot;uppity Jewish consumer advocates&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David,</p>
<p>Suggesting that by considering the effect Obama&#8217;s challenge has on the putative front-runner in his party is somehow keeping down &#8220;uppity blacks&#8221; is itself repugnant&#8230; and patronizing.</p>
<p>Would you have said criticizing Kennedy&#8217;s challenge of Carter was an example of keeping down &#8220;uppity rich white Irish&#8221;? Was criticism of Ralph Nader&#8217;s challenge to Gore keeping down &#8220;uppity Jewish consumer advocates&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sprague D</title>
		<link>http://www.ratdiary.com/2008/01/27/south-carolina-dems-elect-mccain/#comment-4748</link>
		<dc:creator>Sprague D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 01:07:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ratdiary.com/2008/01/27/south-carolina-dems-elect-mccain/#comment-4748</guid>
		<description>Mark,

The white vote wasn&#039;t divided evenly among the 3 main candidates as you suggest. One quarter went to Obama and 3/4 was divided among his rivals. The significance lies in the disproportionate support he received by racial group: 78% of blacks vs. 24% of whites. That&#039;s significant. I agree with you that many of his voters might transfer their support to Clinton in the event that she prevails in the primaries -- but to the extent that they don&#039;t, Obama risks looking like a spoiler (think of Kennedy and Carter in 1980). But then, he might be the Democratic candidate. We&#039;ll see.

And I never said Hillary is electable in a general election -- I don&#039;t believe she will ever be president. My point is that the challenge from Obama makes her election even less likely were she to be the Democratic candidate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark,</p>
<p>The white vote wasn&#8217;t divided evenly among the 3 main candidates as you suggest. One quarter went to Obama and 3/4 was divided among his rivals. The significance lies in the disproportionate support he received by racial group: 78% of blacks vs. 24% of whites. That&#8217;s significant. I agree with you that many of his voters might transfer their support to Clinton in the event that she prevails in the primaries &#8212; but to the extent that they don&#8217;t, Obama risks looking like a spoiler (think of Kennedy and Carter in 1980). But then, he might be the Democratic candidate. We&#8217;ll see.</p>
<p>And I never said Hillary is electable in a general election &#8212; I don&#8217;t believe she will ever be president. My point is that the challenge from Obama makes her election even less likely were she to be the Democratic candidate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David in AK</title>
		<link>http://www.ratdiary.com/2008/01/27/south-carolina-dems-elect-mccain/#comment-4747</link>
		<dc:creator>David in AK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 00:44:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ratdiary.com/2008/01/27/south-carolina-dems-elect-mccain/#comment-4747</guid>
		<description>Your argument seems to boil down to this:

1.  The leading Democratic candidate has baggage that will complicate her chances in the general election.

2.  A younger, less-encumbered Democrat may win the nomination instead (thereby fracturing the party).

3.  This is a bad thing because he&#039;s black and therefore southern white Democrats won&#039;t vote for him.

This is ludicrous--just turn each of the arguments around to see why.  Are we supposed to just accept that Hillary will be our nominee without actually going through a nomination process?  Do we prohibit uppity blacks from campaigning if they actually might win?

For heaven&#039;s sake, why can&#039;t we just conclude that Obama&#039;s winning because he&#039;s inspiring voters and has a solid organization?  This idea that Obama&#039;s supporters are hurting Dem chances this election are, in my view, wrong and frankly repugnant.

The nomination process is working and is generating a lot of excitement and interest.  That&#039;s a *good* thing--get over it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your argument seems to boil down to this:</p>
<p>1.  The leading Democratic candidate has baggage that will complicate her chances in the general election.</p>
<p>2.  A younger, less-encumbered Democrat may win the nomination instead (thereby fracturing the party).</p>
<p>3.  This is a bad thing because he&#8217;s black and therefore southern white Democrats won&#8217;t vote for him.</p>
<p>This is ludicrous&#8211;just turn each of the arguments around to see why.  Are we supposed to just accept that Hillary will be our nominee without actually going through a nomination process?  Do we prohibit uppity blacks from campaigning if they actually might win?</p>
<p>For heaven&#8217;s sake, why can&#8217;t we just conclude that Obama&#8217;s winning because he&#8217;s inspiring voters and has a solid organization?  This idea that Obama&#8217;s supporters are hurting Dem chances this election are, in my view, wrong and frankly repugnant.</p>
<p>The nomination process is working and is generating a lot of excitement and interest.  That&#8217;s a *good* thing&#8211;get over it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mark</title>
		<link>http://www.ratdiary.com/2008/01/27/south-carolina-dems-elect-mccain/#comment-4746</link>
		<dc:creator>mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 00:08:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ratdiary.com/2008/01/27/south-carolina-dems-elect-mccain/#comment-4746</guid>
		<description>Mr rat,

Your logic is absurd.  Barack, Edwards and Hillary have been running fairly even for awhile now and among white voters in SC,they broke not far outside that range yet again.  

Indeed, Hillary got less than a 3rd of the Democratic white vote in SC.  That means more than 2/3rds voted for the other guys.  

2/3rds voted against her!  3/4 voted against Obama.  So this means Hillary is electable in Nov but Obama is not?

Sorry, the issue is will those voters who voted against either of them come back in November and vote for the nominee if it&#039;s not the one they voted for yesterday.  Some might not come back and vote for Barack, but there are a lot of Hillary haters who won&#039;t come back and vote for her either.  

Remember this country allowed black men the right to vote about 75 years before they allowed white woman to.  Sadly, the same might be true for the POTUS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr rat,</p>
<p>Your logic is absurd.  Barack, Edwards and Hillary have been running fairly even for awhile now and among white voters in SC,they broke not far outside that range yet again.  </p>
<p>Indeed, Hillary got less than a 3rd of the Democratic white vote in SC.  That means more than 2/3rds voted for the other guys.  </p>
<p>2/3rds voted against her!  3/4 voted against Obama.  So this means Hillary is electable in Nov but Obama is not?</p>
<p>Sorry, the issue is will those voters who voted against either of them come back in November and vote for the nominee if it&#8217;s not the one they voted for yesterday.  Some might not come back and vote for Barack, but there are a lot of Hillary haters who won&#8217;t come back and vote for her either.  </p>
<p>Remember this country allowed black men the right to vote about 75 years before they allowed white woman to.  Sadly, the same might be true for the POTUS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.511 seconds -->
