<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is Eric Schmidt leading Google over a cliff?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ratdiary.com/2007/12/16/is-eric-schmidt-leading-google-over-a-cliff/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ratdiary.com/2007/12/16/is-eric-schmidt-leading-google-over-a-cliff/</link>
	<description>Homo homini rodentius est</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 19:20:21 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: alüminyum döküm</title>
		<link>http://www.ratdiary.com/2007/12/16/is-eric-schmidt-leading-google-over-a-cliff/#comment-14839</link>
		<dc:creator>alüminyum döküm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Mar 2009 14:53:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ratdiary.com/2007/12/16/is-eric-schmidt-leading-google-over-a-cliff/#comment-14839</guid>
		<description>very good..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>very good..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NYT to Google: &#8220;That was AMAZING, give me a cigarette!&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.ratdiary.com/2007/12/16/is-eric-schmidt-leading-google-over-a-cliff/#comment-9252</link>
		<dc:creator>NYT to Google: &#8220;That was AMAZING, give me a cigarette!&#8221;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Sep 2008 19:44:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ratdiary.com/2007/12/16/is-eric-schmidt-leading-google-over-a-cliff/#comment-9252</guid>
		<description>[...] Saul Hansell for evidence), and I&#8217;ve commented here on some of the more egregious [recent] [examples] of apparently favorable treatment that Google has received from one of the Times&#8217; tech [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Saul Hansell for evidence), and I&#8217;ve commented here on some of the more egregious [recent] [examples] of apparently favorable treatment that Google has received from one of the Times&#8217; tech [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sprague D</title>
		<link>http://www.ratdiary.com/2007/12/16/is-eric-schmidt-leading-google-over-a-cliff/#comment-4531</link>
		<dc:creator>Sprague D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 03:22:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ratdiary.com/2007/12/16/is-eric-schmidt-leading-google-over-a-cliff/#comment-4531</guid>
		<description>Philipp,

Thanks for the link. Interesting. And just a wee bit bizarre...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Philipp,</p>
<p>Thanks for the link. Interesting. And just a wee bit bizarre&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Philipp Lenssen</title>
		<link>http://www.ratdiary.com/2007/12/16/is-eric-schmidt-leading-google-over-a-cliff/#comment-4530</link>
		<dc:creator>Philipp Lenssen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Dec 2007 23:28:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ratdiary.com/2007/12/16/is-eric-schmidt-leading-google-over-a-cliff/#comment-4530</guid>
		<description>Eric Schmidt also sent an email to the NYT:

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/16/technology/16ericmemo-web.html?_r=2&amp;oref=slogin&amp;oref=slogin</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eric Schmidt also sent an email to the NYT:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/16/technology/16ericmemo-web.html?_r=2&amp;oref=slogin&amp;oref=slogin" rel="nofollow">http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/16/technology/16ericmemo-web.html?_r=2&amp;oref=slogin&amp;oref=slogin</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.250 seconds -->
