Comments on: Madonna Dearest

By: Queen Bitch

Queen Bitch — Fri, 03 Nov 2006 16:58:19 +0000

Well well Sprague Dawley…Your welcome for my shared thoughts in the “convo”, but come on…reality setting in now, I did convey what you probably would if you could. Good piece on Madonna by the way…generated exactly what you wanted it to. No Jagermeister here–just a sweet bottle of “fed-up”. Keep it up, I can’t wait to see what’s next!!

By: Sprague D

Sprague D — Fri, 03 Nov 2006 04:37:06 +0000

Queen B: Jeez, hon, Jagermeister and computers don’t mix. Even still, thank you for sharing in the convo.

By: Queen Bitch

Queen Bitch — Thu, 02 Nov 2006 13:30:57 +0000

WHATEVER HOLY FU*K…Carol B…where ever you are…ooooooooooo. You said Madonna was drawn by the smile he got from his natural parents..well starvation is not inherited Carol. Is that where you would rather see a child? Third world is not pretty Carol!! Take off the bifocals …Are you that granola…you probably roll your own tampons.
Now go make love not war…whatever!!

By: Queen Bitch

Queen Bitch — Thu, 02 Nov 2006 13:18:37 +0000

Wow, Nic…..get a life…stop jerking at the computer, get a new outlook on life and you never know…people might actually like you. Are you really like that…can’t imagine people tolerate you in the real world. If you were a sleeping pill you’d cure insomnia!!hehe

By: john

john — Mon, 30 Oct 2006 16:14:15 +0000

you should thank madonna for giving you something to write about. please, you along with her both work for the “entertainment industry”, so why act surprised and indignant over her use of PR re. this issue? don’t act like you don’t know that’s how it goes.

as for devoting 4 out of your 7 paragraphs on what went down on oprah’s show — i say: interesting, very observant, and totally off topic. so what exactly are you trying to say with this post anyway? that she is wrong for adopting a child? or that it is wrong for her to justify her adopting a child? you know all too well that adopting the child, whether a publicity stunt or not, is faultless, so all you can do is resort to nitpicking on her awesome PR connections and her scripted appearance on oprah. like: oh hell, i can’t criticize the root of all this hooplah but i HAVE to find something to criticize so it might as well be the oprah show appearnce! sad, just plain sad i say.

madonna is far from perfect, but she is doing a lot more good to this world than you are or will ever. go find something truly awful to criticize and then maybe you’ll be doing some good.

but of course, we know you won’t be reading this. you dont care what we think. you just write and then post.

By: Minska

Minska — Mon, 30 Oct 2006 15:48:16 +0000

She is and has always been one LUCKY bitch! No talent just luck mixed in with smart people surrounding her. She has no interest in what is good for the child, only sees what she wants and gets it. I will wait patiently until the children grow up and then we shall see the light.

By: karen alexander

karen alexander — Mon, 30 Oct 2006 15:19:48 +0000

Madonna is Shamaeless. Everything and I mean everything is done for money and to cover her ass. Some are and have always been watching and things hidden will always come out. Madonnas days are numbered just like everyones elses. She will have to account for everything she does and has done. She will also have to pay those she deprived alohng the way on her journey that fully was not hers to procure.

By: theoriginalbitch

theoriginalbitch — Sun, 29 Oct 2006 18:59:39 +0000

This case is just too bizarre for words. Its now reported that the father did visit the David regularly and so did his grandmother and uncle. The uncle saw the boy on a daily basis. also, a south african, again according to the orphanage's director, was interested in adopting David before Madonna arrived on the scene. According to the director, Madonna was smitten with the boy and wouldn't be detered. [Link] As for Marc, dude lighten up. If you like Madonna, like her but you can't be so childish to think that she should be allowed to do whatever the hell she wants because she warbles a song and knows how to push buttons. Personally, I don't love her or hate her, liked her music say 20 years ago, find it painfully grating today. I, like many others, see something very suspect in this adoption. [Comment edited -SD]. Grow up.

By: Terry

Terry — Sun, 29 Oct 2006 06:06:07 +0000

Might not sound like a whole lot, but when a person wears philosophy and principles like fashion accessories and dumps them when they’re not really hip anymore, there’s something deeply f*cked up with that person, and doesn’t make that person really credible.
Example? Fur and Madonna

By: Josie R.

Josie R. — Sun, 29 Oct 2006 00:22:34 +0000

Well, all I can say is that you’ve hit that nail very squarely on the head.
I’m relieved to see that I’m not alone in thinking that this move is part of a never-ending ploy to stay in the public eye.