A rat’s agent of grace
I stepped out of the office this morning for one of my million daily smoke breaks and had my tobacco-scented daydreams of world media conquest interrupted by a man asking for a handout. He spoke so softly I wasn’t sure at first if he had asked for the time or for money, though, living in a city, expected the latter. Within a moment of appraising his appearance I was certain and automatically put on my Tender Sympathy® face, featuring the trademark head cocked to the side which means, “I’m sorry, brother, I have nothing to give you.” He was well familiar with my reaction and shuffled off, moving very slowly. But this time I didn’t turn away, I kept looking after him.
He was rail thin, obviously very ill. His clothes weren’t shabby but they were too young for him — baggy jeans and an outsized sweatshirt — though the day was warm and bright. “They’re donated clothes,” I thought. The pants’ seat was dirty from street grime. He moved so slowly.
I threw away the butt, went into the building and headed downstairs to the restaurant for lunch. But it wouldn’t work this time. The incredible absurdity of what I had done replayed itself in my head. Hannah Arendt made her mark recognizing that evil is often the result of banality. Evil can also be an absurdity. I told him I had nothing for him and my pocket was full of money. I was about to spend some of it to make my fat ass fatter and that man looked like he was starving to death. Why had I lied? What was I protecting?
For a moment — and all of this happened within a matter of seconds — I bargained with myself that, from this moment on, I would make it a rule never to deny a beggar. That worked for about one second. What about this beggar? Then the thinking simply… stopped. I turned on my heel and headed back up the stairs, went out of the building and searched for him. Couldn’t find him in the midtown lunchtime throngs. I headed in the direction I had last seen him and, getting to the corner, looked both ways. Found him about 50 feet away. As I approached he was submitting his request to a young man who sinned just as I had done. I was tempted to review the face of the young man as the interaction ended, but denied myself that. It would be selfish and it wasn’t about him.
I walked up and put my hand on the man’s shoulder and in that moment acknowledged how rarely I touch anyone that I haven’t know for years. He stopped and looked at me, not wary, not fearful, not anything beyond present. And now we have to turn the handle on the zoetrope very slowly because time shifted. In a matter of perhaps two seconds I said, “You asked me for something. Will this help?” and offered five dollars. He looked down, took the money and said, “God bless you, sir.” I smiled and nodded and walked back into the building. And that was that. But this is what really happened:
I looked at his face. It was a small sweet face, very lined and weathered, fringed with gray hair that squeezed out from under his baseball cap. His eyes were reddened and deadened but he saw me. I looked away in shame and then looked back because I couldn’t just walk away without acknowledging our interaction. I smiled, I hoped reassuringly. He couldn’t react quickly, his ailing body couldn’t. He looked after me as I walked through the door and I felt as heartbroken as I have ever felt in my life because I couldn’t linger with him. Even for another moment.
A long time ago I took a class with Sara Ruddick at the New School that addressed the question of thinking on moral action. Finally, I know what to say in class: thinking may promote benevolence — but it may also inhibit native compassion and attention to “the small voice within”, as Iris Murdoch referred to it, that can lead us to treat others humanely. The thoughts I had after I walked away from that man, and the lesson learned, are too personal to write about. But the experience opened my eyes to the possibility of everyday grace in a world hardened by personal fears and cold abstractions. Out of nowhere, unbidden, a man asked me a simple question and, perhaps, hopefully, changed the way I treat people as I go through my days.
Believe it or not I’m not religious. Really.
“And when we think we lead, we are most led.”
- Lord Byron

























Absolutely awesome. Good Job!
Comment by Barbara Meiborg — May 30, 2006 @ 9:05 am
Ah, another reason to believe that maybe we aren’t a doomed and despicable bunch of assholes.And isn’t it interesting that the most Christ-like are the ones that claim no religious affiliation or tendency.
Comment by annaeye — June 8, 2006 @ 10:57 pm
If you were not a blogger and a frequent visitor of public introspection, would your heart have led you to react correctly? It is good that you did, and good to write about it. Inspiration to behave morally is what we need more of.
Comment by Joseph Ruger — June 9, 2006 @ 12:42 am
Thanks for the comments, guys (and gals).
Annaeye, you raise an interesting point. Maybe participation in social institutions (like churches) can act to distance people from each other — by creating unconcious us/them distinctions? Just a thought.
And Joseph I don’t know if introspection was the motivating factor — I seemed to act once I stopped thinking. My gut made me act. That deep human connection that comes before words, before thought.
-SD
Comment by Sprague Dawley — June 9, 2006 @ 7:48 am
In my profession, I come across beggars several times a year. I cannot think of a single instance that I refused any of them. It always gives me a nice feeling about humanity when my natural, I repeat, “natural” instinct is to help out my fellow man. As human beings we would all be a lot better off if we allowed these natural instincts to have more of an influence upon the decisions we make in our day to day lives. It has seemed to me, for a very long time, that the rat-race we have created is not a natural state for human-kind, therefore it is very difficult to arrive at natural decisions. thnx
Comment by don diehl — June 9, 2006 @ 4:57 pm
Very touching story, “Rat.” Unfortunately the beggers I have encountered here in the “Heartland” have been revealed as “con men” whose incomes invariably exceed mine. Alas, who does one believe, eh?
Comment by Cap'n Jacq' — June 9, 2006 @ 5:22 pm
Cap’n (any relation to Cap’n Crunch..? ;)),
You go with your gut. In my experience we’re almost infinitely aware of the truth of various situations. You’ll know.
-SD
Comment by Sprague Dawley — June 9, 2006 @ 6:09 pm